There is a wide range of legal interpretations.
@nullue: I like Dr. Ichiro Sato's article in the April issue of Jurist, overall, but I laughed a lot at this footnote https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2dHW_vUcAIsxFD.jpg
https://gyazo.com/14358367b76e71ee98ba1628c5a96cf8
The principle is that programs and their interpretations are unique and unambiguous, and if IT personnel read laws in the same way as programs, they will not understand that there is a range of legal interpretations and will tend to accept interpretations other than the one they are comfortable with.
relevance
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/法解釈には幅がある using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.